Before you teach — read this first

Grade 7 · Lesson 12 — Notes that separate fact from interpretation

Note-taking · blocked · 30 minutes · 17 slides · Launch → I do → We do → Read → You do → Closure
The language behind this lesson — read this before you teach it.
NOTES THAT SEPARATE FACT FROM INTERPRETATION

What it is. Notes mark which lines are the source's facts and which are its opinions.

Why our test works. Every source mixes the two, and a child whose notes do not separate them will later argue from an author's opinion believing it was a fact — the single most damaging thing that can happen between reading and writing. Checkability is the only test a thirteen-year-old can apply reliably, and it is the same distinction Grade 6 met as checkable-versus-judgeable, now applied to somebody else's writing.

Leans on. Grade 6 separated claim from support in an argument.

Watch for. Mark whose interpretation it is, not only that it is one. An unattributed I becomes the child's own opinion within a week.

What this lesson is

Mark which lines are the source's facts and which are its opinions. The worked example is the one you build on the board: Teacher outlines a passage and marks each line F or O, showing one line that looks factual The class reads Writing Book 7, p.51 — our own page, so a child who was absent can still get the lesson.

Why it matters — say this in your own words, about ten seconds.
“A report and the opinion of the one reporting it are two different things, and confusing them wrongs both.”
A different reason every lesson, on purpose. It is not on a slide and it is not a script — if you have a better reason today, use yours. What should land is the idea, not a sentence they can recite.
How it goes

You open by saying where this sits — what it follows and what it is part of — in one sentence, and then you give them the reason it matters, in your own words, for about ten seconds.

Then you do one yourself, building it on the board and leaving it up: Teacher outlines a passage and marks each line F or O, showing one line that looks factual but is not. The board copy is what they look back at when they stall, so it stays there for the whole lesson.

The We-do is the main whiteboard moment of the lesson — short answers, boards up on your signal, every child visible at once. Class labels three lines F or O and defends each. If the answer is a whole sentence rather than a word, take it on their notebooks instead, because a sentence written on a whiteboard is written once and destroyed.

They open Writing Book 7 to page 51 and read it with you. Stop at the worked example and let them look at it.

Exit directions in full, standing still, before anyone moves. Then they work alone: Outline a passage, marking every line F or O.

You close on the exit direction — Read a line you marked O. — taken from every child before anyone stands, and then the line you want them to still have tomorrow: F is what could be checked. I is someone's judgment.

Exit directions — in full, standing still, before anyone moves
Notebook and pencil · Heading first · Outline a passage, marking every line F or O.
Watch for

Mark whose interpretation it is, not only that it is one. An unattributed I becomes the child's own opinion within a week.

As-Suffah Academy · Writing · narrative brief